I've accidentally fallen a bit behind on my blogging--which is silly because I've been enjoying it--but
here is an article I meant to put up awhile ago regarding unionizing in charter schools. As it's shamefully two weeks old, this may be old news to people, but I think it's an important conversation in education right now.
I am a supporter of organizing (or at least the right to), and so the anti-union rhetoric in many Chicago charters is disturbing to me, especially since they seem to be doing a lot of the hiring these days. So beyond the unfortunate situations for some of the teachers who have attempted organizing, what I really appreciate about this article is the cases where charters and unions have been able to make it work, as well as the sentiments from our own C.T.U. regarding moving toward that goal. Often the charters and the unions are presented as binaries, but both share the priorities of high quality teaching and learning, both are a serious part of the educational landscape, and schools would be best served by their ability to work together. If the big sticking point for some charters is the need to not be tangled in the bureaucracy of the traditional big union contract, then perhaps some kind of personalized reconceptualization could work, as exemplified by the Green Dot network in L.A. (which I don't know enough about to make any declarations).
Of course there are fundamentals of professional organization that will need to be held on to, but unfortunately I hear more about the unions consenting to reform in the name of progress and anti-union charters and policymakers voicing a lot less willingness to cooperate. Of course, as this article illustrates, that is not the case for all charter school administrations, and hopefully there will continue to be working examples of how these organizations can find common ground in order focus on our most pressing educational goals--quality student learning--which I'd like to think all sides share.